Home› Chat› General Chat

This months wheel review in 220?

TrisurferTrisurfer Posts: 228
in General Chat
Anyone else think its a shame Zipp wheels weren't included in this test?

Zipp appear to be the market leaders, is there a reason why 220 would leave them out?

Comments

  • jonEjonE Posts: 1,113
    Since most triathletes have probably heard of Zipp,one reason maybe that it is not taking a blinkered view point of the product,and moving aaway from mainstream to dhow what is available.
    Or Zipp didn't provide a test pair.
  • shadowone1shadowone1 Posts: 1,408
    they were... they were the zipps in disguise as SRAM..
  • TrisurferTrisurfer Posts: 228
    Fair enough,

    Still if it is to be an objective review why leave out the prime wheel set.

    Let's face it, if money is no object then zipps are top of most wheel set lists.

    Might as well call it the best of the rest test
  • TRIumphantTRIumphant Posts: 850
    Trisurfer wrote:
    Let's face it, if money is no object then zipps are top of most wheel set lists.
    Really?
  • AtomicAtomic Posts: 126
    .

    Maybe ZIPP hadn't agreed to any advertisment that month. :roll:
  • TesseractTesseract Posts: 280
    They also skipped HED to name another top wheel maker. But then so what? The "test" was a mix of rim depths, clinchers and tubs, so there wasn't any sort of level playing field for a comparison anyway :roll:
Sign In or Register to comment.