What does the submission and review process for a scientific paper look like?
"Writing and publishing" are of central importance in science: As a rule, papers appear in a scientific journal, in conference proceedings, in collective works, or in festschrifts. The submission processes are comparable. The process is generally as follows:
Selection of the topic and the survey of the time until publication
Selection of the target journal, the target group, and possible co-authors
Conducting a literature review and writing the theory section
Obtaining feedback from the supervisor
Documenting the empirical research and methodology
Undertaking a pre-review, e.g., in conferences or with student friends
Implementation of changes
Transfer of the paper to the journal
Initiation of the review process
Decision of the journal on acceptance or rejection
If accepted: incorporation of the reviewer's change requests (possibly a multi-stage process) in dialog with the reviewer
If you follow these steps you will get a good scientific paper in a few steps! Please note, however, that the rejection rate in the first step is high.
About 30 percent of all submissions are rejected immediately and do not even reach the review process. That’s why it’s a good decision to use a writing service sometimes. If you can’t choose a good one, read this review of edubirdie.
The acceptance rate at journals or papers that are then published is only about 1 percent, but these rates vary greatly from journal to journal. How it looks, for example, in the journals for which Elsevier is responsible, can be seen in the following figure.