Options
Ironman 70.3 UK - how hilly is hilly?
just2tri
Posts: 198
in General Chat
Thinking about IMUK 70.3 - all info says it is a very tough and hilly course with 1750m total climb on the bike and 900m overall climb on the run including off road sections.
How hilly is it in reality, from a participants and maybe first timer's view? My home turf is Richmond Park and many consider it to be 'flat' .... north/south banter aside, any suggestions?!
Is this the event to start middle distance with?
How hilly is it in reality, from a participants and maybe first timer's view? My home turf is Richmond Park and many consider it to be 'flat' .... north/south banter aside, any suggestions?!
Is this the event to start middle distance with?
0
Comments
fun2tri do a middle distance at trentham which is supposed to be quite flat....or the little woody is supposed to be ok...its either them of full IM for me next year.
That said, it was my first 70.3, and I loved every minute of it - despite pulling a calf muscle a week before the race while training. I went with the idea that, even with a duff leg, I could still complete the swim and bike, then I would take the run as it came, depending on the leg. I had decent (for me) swim and bike legs (I was off the bike after 4:20), and if I had run my predicted half-marathon time could have had a 6:15 finish, which I would have been delighted with. As things turned out my calf went again 200m into the run. I thought about quitting, but realised I had over 5 hours until the run cut-off, and that I could probably walk the rest of the course in that time, so I carried on. I jogged where I could, and walked the uphill sections - of which there are plenty, but only one really tough one, and finished in 6:48 which, given the circumstances, I was chuffed with.
I guess the upshot is that yes, the hills are much more severe that Richmond Park, and this will have a knock-on effect on your run, but the atmosphere at the race was fantastic. As long as you are realistic in your expectations you will have a great day - I certainly did!
FK
However, don't do what I did, which was spend all winter worrying about the bike and ignoring the run, the run is key to this race, it's really hard, again train accordingly.
However, the sense of achievement completing this race is huge, it's an amazing race, get pre-registered
The most I did was the hill by the plantation in Richmond Park, but I would do several laps, attacking the hill in a harder gear each time. Splits were swim - 40m, T1 7m29s, bike 3:35, T2 3m14s and run 2:22.
Prior to this I'd done one sprint and 3 ODs over the previous three years. Since then I did a full IM race in the New Forest. I've listened to advice from loads of people, and read the forums aplenty, but the only way to find out just how difficult something is is to get off my arse and have a crack at it.
I'm doing IM Switzerland next summer, and IMUK 70.3 fall in quite a good time with the training schedule so I may well do it again. Alternatively, there is one in Weymouth about the same time which is not M-Dot, so is quite a bit cheaper. I would like to have another go at Wimbleball without any injuries though - just to see if I can crack 5:59.
Get the base work in over the winter and I'm sure you'll be fine!
FK
Good luck with you plans for 2010!
But yes I posted a slower time At both events I suffered some stomach issues, but it was a lot worse in Wiesbaden. When I did Wimbleball I put it down to eating to much because I didn't know any different. But now I have done two and had stomach issues at both I can only conclude I'm not getting my nutrition right?